Home
1
Products
2
Werewolf Coblation3
https://www.shmedical.com.tw/ Sheng Hung Medical Co.,Ltd.
72290105

Werewolf Coblation

Official website Click here

More control, proven outcomes 1,2 and inner confidence

The COBLATION◊ System delivers FASTER patient recovery3, BETTER long-term patient outcomes1,2, and is SAFE to use on all soft tissue types4,5,6, compared to mechanical debridement of the knee in clinical studies.

The WEREWOLF System has 5 operating modes to address different soft tissue types and AMBIENT◊  real-time temperature monitoring/over-rides.

7f0422b0cdf5eff54fc7204e08d27bd9.jpg

Five Operating Modes for more control

  • COAG: 2 coagulation settings provide hemostasis during surgery
  • Low: designed and indicated specifically for articular cartilage
  • Medium: designed for dense tissue (Meniscus, Labrum)
  • High: designed for bulk debridement (ACL stump)
  • Vac: designed for keeping a clear view, removes bubbles and debris" 

The FLOW 50 Wand adapts to multiple tissue types such as articular cartilage, meniscus, and ligamentous tissue, efficiently resecting targeted tissue while preserving health surrounding tissue. FLOW~IQ technology provides automated wand suction to optimize performance across tissue types. COBLATION◊  FLOW 50 Wand with FLOW~IQ Technology


NEW! WEREWOLF◊  COBLATION◊  System introduces the innovative FLOW 90 Wand. more information can be found here.

Please contact us for more detail if you are located in Taiwan!
 
Reference
1. Spahn, G, Klinger HM, Mückley T, Hofmann GO. Four-Year Results From a Randomized Controlled Study of Knee Chondroplasty With Concomitant Medial Meniscectomy: Mechanical Debridement Versus Radiofrequency Chondroplasty. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 26, No 9 (September, Suppl 1), 2010: pp S73-S80. DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.030.
2. Spahn G, Hofmann GO, von Engelhardt LV. Mechanical
Debridement Versus Radiofrequency in Knee Chondroplasty with Concomitant Medial Meniscectomy: 10-year Results from a Randomized Controlled Study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. DOI 10.1007/s00167-015-3810-6. Epub 2015 October 1.
3. Spahn G, Kahl E, Mückley T, Hofmann GO, Klinger HM. Arthroscopic Knee Chondroplasty using a Bipolar Radiofrequency-based Device Compared to Mechanical Shaver: Results of a
Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc (2008) 16:565–573. DOI 10.1007/s00167-008-0506-1. Epub 2008 March 8.
4. Gharaibeh, M., Szomor A., Chen D.B. & MacDessi, S.J. 2017. Cartilage. A Retrospective Study Assessing Safety and Efficacy of Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for Knee Chondral Lesions. Cartilage. 2017 Apr 1. [Epub ahead of print]
5. Voloshin, I., Morse K.R., Allred, C.D., Bissell, S.A., Maloney, M.D. & DeHaven, K.E. Arthroscopic evaluation of radiofrequency chondroplasty of the knee. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2007; 35: 1702-1707.
* FDA cleared for use in the knee on all soft tissue types.

 

Manufactured by ArthroCare Corporation, 7000 W. William Cannon Drive, Austin, TX 78735
1420431